Ethics and Moral reasoning Essay

Facing Life While struggle For an EndEvery one of us depart watch down feather the face of death at nigh point in our roll in the hays however, some w nauseated face it in frequently more than unpleasant mess then others. We all start out a by rights to choose what we essential to do with our bodies. We even have the right to decide that we no eternal wish to s termination a right smarture the suffering and suffering of a terminal illness. endpoint illness is when someone is suffering from something that will eventually repulse their sustenance regardless of any medical interventions. In this paper I will discuss the point in which a psyche has a right to decide if they want to die and what processes argon value-systemally moral in aiding them in seeing their wishes come to fruition. Medicine has created more ways to remedy or to minimize a persons suffering from diseases that were at one time fatal or painful. Medical technology has disposed(p) us the top exe cutive to sustain the lives of patients whose physical and mental capabilities can non be restored, whose degenerating conditions cannot be reversed, and whose pain cannot be eliminated.As medicine struggles to pull more and more tribe out-of-door from the edge of death, there are pleas for relief outpouring from the tortured, deteriorated lives that all of us be merciful and give them the relief they need. (C Andre, and M Velazquez, KND). When a person is faced with the end of their keep, it is said that we should agree that the absence of pain and the overcharge of the person should be taken into great consideration. When a terminally ill person is no longer capable of intellectual pursuits, is in immutable pain and must rely on others for all of their needs, Mill feels that it is a more dignified choice to end the suffering, therefor fulfilling the absence of pain principle (pain including ones inability to seek higher entertainment through intellectual pursuit) (J Conley, April 2010). Doctors are at the epicenter ofcontroversies regarding end of demeanor issues and face so much scrutiny from both sides of opposing groups. close to desexualizes suppose that it is okay to assist the patient in their wish to end their suffering by simply discontinuing any and all life-timesaving interventions.Other doctors believe that every effort must be made to save the persons life until there is nothing else left to do. Once the doctor has reached this point they will place patients under hospice care and the patients are given medications to treat their pain much(prenominal) as morphine. The doses are in much(prenominal) high amounts that the patient is no longer coherent and able to doctor endings on their own. They will usually expire within days pursual their first does due to how the medication slows down the heart and breathing. Supporters of the utilitarian ethic believe that the benefits of assisted suicide outweigh the costs. They argue that ass isted suicide allows terminally ill patients to avoid needless pain and misery in their final days. They believe that it will allow a patient to go on control over the timing and manner of their death verses having to face an fainthearted timeline and suffer for what could be far longer and harder than a physician whitethorn give. The utilitarian believes that this would en received that they would die with a sense of dignity.Post significantly it would insure that an individuals right to self-autonomy would be honored at the end of life (M. Levin, KND). If you whole step at the views of a deontologist they would oppose this method because deontologists are all approximately duty. While both deontologists and utilitarians would typically do the same thing, Deontologists act out of duty, and would make their decision completely once they see that the patient is on their last nog and is unable to respond for themselves, while the utilitarian acts out of a mean to provide a sen se of peace. When you are a utilitarian people may view you as irrational and emotional and not take you serious, while a deontologist may come across as a bit crude or even heartless. The downside to being in such a place to make these tough decisions can bring about current issues such as individuals feeling pressured to terminate their life because of a misperception of their diagnosis or prognosis because of depression or because of a hit for the burden they place on others and the depletion of their assets. Some individuals may feel pressured to end life by selfish family members or caregivers. This is why it is so classical for the superiors to handle each case as though it is so sensitive. all(prenominal)patient must be thoroughly analyzed to make sure that they meet the proper criteria for end of life intervention. Life is about exploitation and learning, however, sometimes we are very limited to what we are able to do. This has no bearing on the tone of life and in no way should be used in ones decision to end their life nor should doctors look at limitations as a good reason to end life. The only times someone should be allowed to choose death over life is if they are unable to live a life that is rich and broad(a) of opportunity in spite of their illness. Meaning, that the illness is causing too much pain or that the illness in not allowing them to enjoy certain activities that they normally love doing. Then and only then the person should be able to choose what they want to do. Let me clarify this a weeny further. As we get older we will all eventually not be able to enjoy certain activities that we were once were able to, this solely would not be a reason to want to take your life, because your quality of life has not been interrupted.What would be a good reason is a person confined to a bed, being taken care of twenty-four-seven by a loved one or care giver and doctors have said that the chances of healing are not there. We will all stare down death in the face at some point. However, life is not about dying, but about living. If a person cannot live a life rich and full of meaning due to a terminal illness, they have the right to choose to live or die. If those rights are infringed upon the person withholding ones personal rights should face do-or-die(a) consequences. Life is hard as it is, but then to be discolor and living it in pain and suffering would be unimaginable and more inhumane then having it ended with the assistance of a medical professional on an at will basis.REFERENCESIturiguy, July 5, 2008. The Decision To End Ones Own Life Is A Fundamental Human Right. Retrieved bound 10, 2014 from www.opposingviews.com Wikipedia, KND. Utilitarianism. Retrieved March 24, 2014 from www.wikipedia.com C. Andrea and M. Valdez, KND. Assisted Suicide A Right or A equipment casualty? Retrieved March 24, 2014 from www.scu.edu J. Conley, April 2010. Kantian vs. Utilitarian Ethics of Euthanasia. Retrieved March 24, 2014 from www.wp4dying.blogspot.com M. Levine, KND. PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE virtue AND MORALITY. Retrieved March 24, 2014, fromwww.levinlaw.com