Dispute on Employee Motivation

Arnold nacreous is the Director of Human Resources at union XYZ, in the same industry as participation first principle. John Chaplin has new joined company XYZ as Human Resources Manager. A recent fine-tune with a major in Organizational Behavior, he presents new ideas to moreovertony almost everyday. But, Chaplin has a speech dis lay. He stammers, and cannot make himself clear at all times. A week back, Bright and Chaplin began to argue about employee pauperism. Bright informed Chaplin that their company has the cypher to enhance employee pauperism with the best motivation sweetener broadcast in the industry.He was referring to the use of follow ABCs motivation enhancement program for its employees. confederation ABC happens to be a leader in the industry, after all. Yet, Chaplin asserted that keep company XYZ should develop its ingest employee motivation enhancement program with new question on the needs of employees at Company XYZ in particular. The argument turne d into a repugn because Bright refused to agree with Chaplin. The latter was threatened that he would be laid-off if he fails to follow Brights instructions to implement Company ABCs program. The ProblemChaplin would lose his job if he does not agree to implement Company ABCs program for employee motivation enhancement in Company XYZ. He knows, however, that his boss has an amenable personality. Thus, Chaplin would bid to provide further information to Bright. He firmly considers that Bright has to be explained why it is best for Company XYZ to develop its own employee motivation enhancement program based on new research on its employees needs. subsequently all, Chaplin is aware of latest research in the field of Organizational Behavior. Should Company XYZ implement Company ABCs motivation enhancement program?Organizational behavior theories are known to differ as to what motivates employees, but not necessarily because the essential characteristics of all employees are varied across organizations and industries. Rather, the motivational needs of employees differ from organization to organization because enlighten tempt situations, ethics and settings, in addition to their interaction with individual personalities, teams, and managements call for incompatible employee needs to be prioritized. Employee motivation is simply referred to as an organizational regularity to satisfy employees in areas where they feel unsatisfied.Whereas poor health and safety conditions skill be the Number One challenge to encounter in Company ABC, it is possible that the employees of Company XYZ would be more actuate by high salaries. Moreover, the employees of Company XYZ may hold a collective opinion that their get toings conditions are the best in the industry. Given that job performance is a function of ability and motivation, it is appropriate to inquire into the needs of workers in order to employ the correct mix of employee motivation strategies to boost job per formance, company-wide (Employee pauperism).As an example, the employees of the Piketon Research and Extension Center and Enterprise Center were asked about the of import motivating factors at their particular workplace. According to research findings, the employees believed themselves to be motivated by the following in the order of importance a) interesting work, (b) right(a) wages, (c) full appreciation of work done, (d) job security, (e) good working conditions, (f) promotions and harvest-home in the organization, (g) feeling of being in on things, (h) personal homage to employees, (i) tactful discipline, and (j) sympathetic help with personal problems (Lindner).Contrary to these findings, a peer reviewed instruct on employee motivation found that most employees across various organizations believe the following to be the chief motivators at the workplace enjoyment of the work work/life balance pay satisfaction link amid pay and performance and adequate staffing levels (K atcher). Thus, it appears essential to increase employee motivation wholly after inquiring into the main motivators in a specific organization.Also deep down a single organization, the blue collar workers are expected to be more motivated by an increase in pay, while the sinlessness collar employees might believe that enjoyment of work is most essential. In this case, the organization would have to divide up its employees in two separate groups to inquire into the particular motivators for the blue collar workers as opposed to the flannel collar employees.It is best, therefore, for employee motivation strategies to be based on group by group studies. Chaplin should write a memorandum to Bright with latest research on the subject. It is possible that the latter has misunderstood Chaplin because of his speech disorder. Chaplin knows that Company XYZ has the budget to conduct new research on its employees needs to enhance their motivation.He should as well mention in his note to B right that implementation of Company ABCs employee motivation program may possibly waste the resources of Company XYZ. After all, it may very well be that employees at Company ABC have a different set of needs altogether. So, so far though Company ABC is a cable leader, Company XYZ should stop from blindly following its programs without a scientific inquiry into its own business processes and workplace culture.