Moral Quandary of Race Essay

In his book, I am non a Racist, andThe Moral Quandary of melt down, Lawrence A. Blum, a professor of Philosophy and Liberal Arts, ventures into unrecognized and teeny-weeny known aspects of racial discrimination. His definition and analysis of racism and its implications, projects the vastness of the subject, which had generally been regarded as sound a exsanguine attitude. Blum describes racism as antipathy towards somebodys of a racialized group, stemming from wanting(p)ization or the idea that the group is inferior in sexual relation to separate groups.Blum considers a person to be a racist totally when he intentionally makes racist comments or jokes, impelled by racial antipathy. He feels that the honourable significance of the term racism seems to be losing its value, as it is being overused or withal commsolely used. Today, in practical demeanor, either direct or indirect references which run feelings of racial groups are considered racist. This not s ave dilutes the very meaning of racism but also weakens its power of ethical condemnation. The rule book racism and its related terminology of necessity to be more clear, due to its relevancy in personal racism, racist, racist article of beliefs at various levels.The author feels the term racism is being more used taboo of context, like black students intending to sit with other black students for lunch or white teacher being uncomfortable talking with the black parents, which are all regarded as racism. The book also emphasizes the need to spread over race-based statistical data with greater anxiety and concern as they influence individual perceptions. The statistical differences among the views of racial groups must be projected without any overracialization (p35). Overstating the differences of such views would only reinforce A book limited review 3an individuals racist vox populi and close them to persuading arguments or cerebral conversation. Opposing the general notion that racial groups have a putting green order of business with regard to their group, Blum emphasizes the need to recognize the humans of internal diversity within affable groups. Racial groups with a sizable universe of discourse cannot have a case-by-case legal opinion or stand. Several factors including age, gender, religion, culture etc. influence the formation of a viewpoint of an individual (p55). Blum therefore attributes it to misrecognition or poor recognition rising from ignorance, when any single viewpoint is attributed to an entire race.Although Blum feels that whites should not go out their relevance and association with racism, he adds that racism is not confined only to the whites. For font Chinese, Japanese, and blacks too exhibit racist attitude to other colored people and whites. The belief of their racial superiority is developed by colored people, which makes them regard other groups inferior (p33). In this book, Blum indicates our hypersensitivity to the word racism and suggests that racist insensitivity and subconscious racial intolerance are indeed acts, which need to be eliminated, but need not be tagged as racist.Blum is of the opinion that racial prejudice is an unavoidable solvent of cultural diversity. Our view and way of life today is associated with racist ideologies, which we have inherited. The idea of race had developed from the sixteenth century, A book view 4 hit its peak in the late 19th century. History holds the key for our present description on human diversity in terms of similarity, differences and superiority among races (p109).Blum explores the idea of doing outdoor(a) with the concept of race, but warns that it should be only after all associated wrongdoings are full addressed. The book covers all vital aspects of racism including its history and, what we actually mean and specify of race. It incorporates much useful information on the topic, carefully thought and reasoned, illustrated by qualifi ed examples. I am not a Racist, ButThe Moral Quandary of Race is indeed an important book not only to scholars but also to the common man in quest of intellectual racism.